Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Marilyn Vann, et al v. DOI, et al
as 11-5322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marilyn Vann, Ronald Moon, Donald Moon and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of the Interior, Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and Bill John Baker, in his Official Capacity as Acting Principal Chief of the Cherokee Nation
Intervenor - Appellee:
Cherokee Nation
Williams v. Cherokee Nation Entertainment
as 11-5107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES H. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHEROKEE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, L.L.C.
Williams v. Cherokee Nation Entertainment, L.L.C.
as 4:2011cv00360
Plaintiff:
James H Williams
Defendant:
Cherokee Nation Entertainment, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Walker v. Casino Cherokee Nation
as 6:2011cv00002
Plaintiff:
Keeble Donale Walker
Defendant:
Casino Cherokee Nation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-6157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hough et al v. Cherokee Nation et al
as 6:2007cv00093
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hough, Jennifer Hough and Chad Hough
Defendant:
Cherokee Nation, John T. Cripps, Joshua Neal Turtle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
