Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Timothy Johnson v. Michael Rogers, et al
as 19-1366
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, TROY RIGGS, in his official capacity as Chief of the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department and MICHAEL ROGERS, individually and in his offical capacity as an Officer for the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY JOHNSON
HARDIMAN et al v. CHIEF et al
as 1:2018cv00348
Defendant:
CHIEF OF THE INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOHN DOE 1 THROUGH 3
Plaintiff:
DAMON HARDIMAN and BOBBY HOUSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TICHY v. CHIEF OF THE INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2017cv04426
Defendant:
CHIEF OF THE INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
GINGER TICHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WASHINGTON v. THE MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR et al
as 1:2016cv02980
Defendant:
CHIEF OF THE INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR and MAYOR OF THE CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS/MARION COUNTY
Plaintiff:
LEROY WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darrell Johnson v. Paul Ciesielski, et al
as 11-2957
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL R. CIESIELSKI, in his official capacity as Chief of Police Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department, JEREMY B. DEVENNING, individually and in his official capacity as an IMPD Officer, BRIAN THORLA, individually and in his official capacity as an IMPD officer and others
Carol Woodard v. Greg Zoeller, et al
as 09-3418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROL WOODARD
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY M. MORRISON, in his official capacity as United States Attoreny and in his personal capacity, WINFIELD D. ONG, in his official capacity as Assistant United States Attorney and in his personal capacity, MICHAEL WELCH, in his official capacity as Special Agent in charge and in his personal capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
