Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Bachmann et al v. Lane et al
as 3:2026cv00536
Plaintiff:
Henry Bachmann, Courtney Bachmann and Matthew Lemme
Defendant:
Chris Lane, Elizabeth Stigdon, Delmas Philpot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. BISHOP et al
as 4:2026cv00008
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY TROY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
TERRIN L BISHOP, S LYLES, FORSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANNS v. ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC. et al
as 1:2025cv01084
Plaintiff:
JOEY LAMONT MANNS
Defendant:
ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., ROY WASHINGTON, BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Aitken v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 25-11342
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MICHAEL AITKEN
Defendant:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, POLK, ASSISTANT WARDEN CHRISTINA CREWS and others
Williams v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 3:2025cv00374
Plaintiff:
Anthony T Williams
Defendant:
Chris Lane, Ricky Dixon and Michael Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haile v. Lane et al
as 3:2025cv00337
Defendant:
Chris Lane, Rebecca Bertone, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
John S. Haile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRAY v. BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. et al
as 1:2025cv00490
Plaintiff:
KARI SPRAY
Defendant:
BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT., JOHN REYNOLDS, KEITH NELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00092
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aitken v. Dixon et al
as 3:2025cv00009
Defendant:
Sergeant Robinson, Warden Chris Lane, Captain Minnich and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Aitken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
