Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Wiley v. US Supreme Court et al
as 3:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Wiley, III
Defendant:
US Supreme Court, US Court of Appeals, Jeff Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiley v. United States of America Government
as 3:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Wiley, III
Defendant:
United States of America Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiley v. Government
as 3:2021cv00739
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Wiley
Defendant:
Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiley v. Edwards et al
as 3:2016cv00287
Defendant:
John Bell Edwards, Jr., Margaret Dumas Mental Health System, Rule Security 35 Washington D.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Wiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wiley v. P.E.C. C.E.C. Mental Health Dr. et al
as 3:2015cv00623
Respondent:
James Caldwell, Doctors Nurse M.H.T. and P.E.C. C.E.C. Mental Health Dr.
Petitioner:
Christopher George Wiley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Wiley v. East LA Mental Health System
as 15-30199
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER GEORGE WILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
EAST LOUISIANA MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEM
Christopher Wiley v. East LA Mental Health System
as 14-31223
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER GEORGE WILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
EAST LOUISIANA MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEM
Wiley v. The United States
as 3:2014cv00354
Defendant:
The United States
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Wiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiley v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2014cv00337
Respondent:
James Caldwell and East Louisiana Mental Health System
Petitioner:
Christopher George Wiley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
