Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Nora, Wendy et al v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 3:2019cv00003
Defendant:
Theron Edward Parsons, IV, Mark W. Rattan, James J. Winiarski and others
Plaintiff:
Wendy Alison Nora, Christopher King and Roger Peter Rinaldi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv07369
Plaintiff:
Sean Christopher King
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shamburger et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00478
Plaintiff:
Sydney Shamburger , Lewis Campbell, Jr. , Dennis Northcutt and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Werlich
as 3:2016cv00300
Petitioner:
Christopher King
Respondent:
T Werlich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King v. Cross
as 3:2015cv00997
Petitioner:
Christopher King
Respondent:
James Cross, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Zachary Medlock v. Trustees of Indiana University, et al
as 13-1900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ZACHARY MEDLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY, BENJAMIN MONAHAN-ESTES, in his individual capacity, CAITLIN CLARK, in her individual capacity and others
Christopher King v. James Cross, Jr.
as 12-1159
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER KING
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES CROSS, JR., Warden
Zachary Medlock v. Trustees of Indiana University, et al
as 11-3288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ZACHARY MEDLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY, BENJAMIN MONAHAN-ESTES, in his individual capacity, CAITLIN CLARK, in her individual capacity and others
MEDLOCK et al v. THE TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2011cv00977
Defendant:
CAITLIN CLARK, HAROLD GOLDSMITH, KAREN HANSON and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY MEDLOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Cross
as 3:2010cv00879
Petitioner:
Christopher King
Respondent:
J Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
