Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Perricone v. City of Mineral Wells, Texas
as 4:2019cv00992
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Perricone
Defendant:
City of Mineral Wells, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burgess v. USA
as 3:2018cv00327
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Burgess
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stewart v. USA
as 4:2018cv00054
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cobos v. Potter et al
as 1:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Cobos
Defendant:
Gary Potter, John W Smith, Robert Junell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penson v. Warden, FCI Three Rivers
as 2:2016cv00403
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Penson
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Three Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cobos v. Ector County
as 7:2015cv00183
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Cobos
Defendant:
Ector County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cobos v. Ector County et al
as 7:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Cobos
Defendant:
Mark Donaldson, Ector County, G Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. State of Texas
as 1:2014cv00610
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Fuller
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
State of Texas
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Penson v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv00581
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Penson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hodge et al v. Anderson et al
as 1:2013cv00007
Defendant:
Ann Anderson, Mandy White-Rogers, Chad Teeler and others
Plaintiff:
Laurel April Hodge, L. J. L., Rufus Jason Cloud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
