Cases 1 - 10 of 2,149
Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. RK Family, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02275
Plaintiff:
Twin City Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
RK Family, Inc., RK Holdings, LLP doing business as Rural King and Shaun Amrine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Board of Lucas County Commissioners et al. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al.
as 3:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
Board of Lucas County Commissioners, City of Toledo and Environmental Law & Policy Center
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Michael Regan and Debra Shore
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Nancy Hooks v. City of Warren, MI, et al
as 24-1375
Plaintiff:
NANCY HOOKS
Defendant:
CITY OF WARREN, MI, POLICE OFFICER LUCAS DOE, POLICE OFFICER BRYAN MUNAFO and others
Kelly Key v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 24-1348
Plaintiff:
KELLY ROYCE KEY
Defendant:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI and WAYNE COUNTY, MI TREASURER
Key v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2024cv11054
Plaintiff:
Kelly Royce Key
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Michigan, State of and American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees
Zelesnik v. Mayor Aftab Pureval et al
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Mayor Aftab Pureval, Teresa Theetge, Roxanne Qualls and others
Shade v. Harper Woods, City of
as 2:2024cv10976
Plaintiff:
Daevon Shade
Defendant:
Harper Woods, City of
USA v. City of Akron, OH, et al
as 24-3277
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CITY OF AKRON, OH and STATE OF OHIO
Saulsbery v. City of Columbus
as 2:2024cv01425
Plaintiff:
Vernon Saulsbery
Defendant:
City of Columbus
McGory et al. v. City of Sandusky, Ohio
as 3:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Blake McGory, Elaine McGory, Ernest Ettore and others
Defendant:
City of Sandusky, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
