Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pinney v. Police of la Salle, IL et al
as 1:2023cv12414
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Pinney and Gitapushy Val Angel
Defendant:
Police of la Salle, IL, Housing Authority of la Salle County IL, Court of la Salle County, IL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Puello v. City of Lawrence et al
as 1:2023cv12003
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Puello
Defendant:
City of Lawrence and Ariel Montas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bradley v. York County Sheriff et al
as 1:2022cv10269
Plaintiff:
George E Bradley
Defendant:
York County Sheriff, Portland City Police, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Sifton v. North Adams, City of et al
as 3:2021cv30057
Defendant:
North Adams, Berkshire County, North Adams, City of, Kevin Fitzpatrick and others
Plaintiff:
Richard F Sifton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabaldon v City of Norfolk Massachusetts
as 1:2021cv10465
Plaintiff:
Frank Gabaldon
Defendant:
City of Norfolk Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron v. City of Lowell et al
as 1:2021cv10400
Plaintiff:
Paul Aaron
Defendant:
Nickolas Dokos, City of Lowell, David Lavoie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gandolfo v. City of Medford and its Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv10325
Defendant:
Officers John Doe and Richard Roe, Lena Gasparro, City of Medford and its Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gandolfo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron v. City of Lowell et al
as 1:2020cv11604
Defendant:
John Doe, Board of Inquiry Internal Investigation, City of Lowell and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Aaron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
