Cases 41 - 50 of 2,882
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Coaxum v. Citibank N.A. et al
as 8:2024cv00972
Plaintiff:
Latesha Shante Coaxum
Defendant:
Citibank N.A., Vice President Frank Myers and The State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1638 Truth in Lending
Melamed v. Citibank, N.A.
as 2:2024cv02495
Plaintiff:
Andrew Melamed
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Li et al v. CitiBank, N.A.
as 0:2024cv60515
Plaintiff:
Bingsong Li and Xiu M. Huang
Defendant:
CitiBank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Li et al v. CitiBank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv21210
Plaintiff:
Bingsong Li and Xiu M. Huang
Defendant:
CitiBank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Fraud
United States of America v. Arrigo et al
as 1:2024cv10830
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony M. Arrigo, Anna M. Arrigo, Citibank, N.A., Not In Its Individual Capacity, But Solely As Trustee of NRZ Pass-Through Trust VI, 388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor, New York, NY and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Citibank, N.A. v. Sims et al
as 1:2024cv02043
Plaintiff:
Citibank, N.A.
Defendant:
Sheilah D. Sims
Garnishee:
Office Of Personnel Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
