Cases 1 - 10 of 54
U.S. Bank National Association v. Richmond
as 24-1342
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as trustee, on behalf of the holders of the Asset Backed Securities Corporation Home Equity Loan Trust, Series NC 2005-HE8, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series NC 2005-HE8
Defendant:
ERIC H. RICHMOND, a/k/a Eric H. Richmond and CITIMORTGAGE, INC., f/k/a Citicorp Mortgage Securities, Inc.
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) v. .025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 1006 North Payson Street in Baltimore City, Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv02158
Defendant:
Yvette Wormley, The Estate of Lula Thrower, Testate and Intestate Successors of Lula Thrower and others
Plaintiff:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
U.S. Bank National Association v. Richmond, et al
as 23-1573
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as trustee, on behalf of the holders of the Asset Backed Securities Corporation Home Equity Loan Trust, Series NC 2005-HE8, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series NC 2005-HE8
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC RICHMOND, a/k/a Eric Richmond and ERIC H. RICHMOND, a/k/a Eric H. Richmond
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., f/k/a Citicorp Mortgage Securities, Inc.
U.S. Bank National Association v. Richmond, et al
as 23-1574
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as trustee, on behalf of the holders of the Asset Backed Securities Corporation Home Equity Loan Trust, Series NC 2005-HE8, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series NC 2005-HE8
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC RICHMOND, a/k/a Eric Richmond and ERIC H. RICHMOND, a/k/a Eric H. Richmond
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., f/k/a Citicorp Mortgage Securities, Inc.
US Bank National Association v. Richmond
as 22-1309
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as trustee, on behalf of the holders of the Asset Backed Securities Corporation Home Equity Loan Trust, Series NC 2005-HE8, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series NC 2005-HE8
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC RICHMOND, a/k/a Eric Richmond
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., f/k/a Citicorp Mortgage Securities, Inc.
US Bank National Association v. Richmond
as 22-1273
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as trustee, on behalf of the holders of the Asset Backed Securities Corporation Home Equity Loan Trust, Series NC 2005-HE8, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series NC 2005-HE8
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC RICHMOND and ERIC RICHMOND, a/k/a Eric Richmond
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., f/k/a Citicorp Mortgage Securities, Inc.
US Bank National Association v. Richmond
as 22-1266
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as trustee, on behalf of the holders of the Asset Backed Securities Corporation Home Equity Loan Trust, Series NC 2005-HE8, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series NC 2005-HE8
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC RICHMOND and ERIC RICHMOND, a/k/a Eric Richmond
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., f/k/a Citicorp Mortgage Securities, Inc.
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. RICHMOND et al
as 2:2021cv00208
Defendant:
ERIC RICHMOND, CITIMORTGAGE INC, ERIC H RICHMOND and others
Plaintiff:
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Salma Agha-Khan v. Mortgage Electronic Registrati, et al
as 18-16553
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALMA AGHA-KHAN, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC., a mortgage registration system, Delaware corporation not registered to do business in Nevada, MERSCORP HOLDINGS, INC., parent of Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems Inc. not registered to do business in Nevada, ASPEN MORTGAGE LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Corporation and others
Agha-Khan v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02739
Plaintiff:
Salma Agha-Khan
Defendant:
Akerman Senterfitt, LLP, David Alessi, Robert Alessi and others
702) 471-7070 (fax:
Merscorp Holdings Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
