Cases 1 - 10 of 100
JOHNSON v. THE CITY OF PHILA, POLICE DEPT ET AL et al
as 2:2026cv06293
Plaintiff:
DAMON JOHNSON
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILA, POLICE DEPT ET AL, POLICE OFFICER SOLOMON, JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LAWSON v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2026cv03880
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL LAWSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, K & A TOWING and BREWERYTOWN BAKERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jarvis v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2025cv05920
Plaintiff:
Roland Blair Jarvis, Sr
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CAPTAIN DOE NO.1, City of Phila Law CAPTAIN DOE NO.2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
OLIVER v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2025cv00171
Defendant:
TIM BASS, RICHARD BOVA, RICHARD HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
MONTRELL OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ENTY v. ANDRE et al
as 2:2024cv04888
Plaintiff:
KYLE RICHARD ENTY
Defendant:
SHERIFF ROCHELLE BILIAL, MAYOR CHERELLE PARKER, CITY OF PHILA. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALVAREZ v. CITY OF PHILA ET AL
as 2:2024cv03127
Plaintiff:
KING ANTHONY ALVAREZ
Defendant:
HUD, TURN, COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES doing business as CLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
DOE v. LACOLMB et al
as 2:2024cv01843
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
PIERRE LACOLMB, C/O GINDRAW, BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
ENTY v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2023cv04651
Plaintiff:
KYLE R. ENTY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA., TANISHA BEY and KRISTEN ABNEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
