Cases 41 - 50 of 450
Jordan v. Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Rollin Cook, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Pliler
as 1:2022cv03451
Petitioner:
James E. Clark
Respondent:
W. S. Pliler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clark v. Pliler
as 1:2022cv03193
Petitioner:
James Edward Clark
Respondent:
W.S. Pliler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Urena v. Roy et al
as 1:2022cv02384
Plaintiff:
Amaury V. Urena
Defendant:
Yana A. Roy, Darcel Clark and Alvarado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Hakeem Clark
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Earl Bell, T. Zerniak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Hanley
as 22-302
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Clark
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Veronica-May Clark
Defendant / Appellee:
Thomas Hanley, Kevin Manlef, Bouldrf and others
Urena v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv01189
Plaintiff:
Amaury Urena
Defendant:
City of New York, Captain Pines, Captain Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Allen Rogers Scott
Defendant:
Ann Marie T. Sullivan, Daniell Dill, Mr. Jamie Temple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baltas v. Cook
as 22-65
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joe Baltas
Defendant / Appellee:
Rollin Cook, In His Individual and Official Capacities, a Connecticut DOC employee
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, In His Individual and Official Capacities, Allen, In His Individual and Official Capacities, Little, In His Individual and Official Capacities and others
Clark v. Pappoosha et al
as 3:2021cv01690
Plaintiff:
Willie Clark
Defendant:
Pappoosha, Pain, Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
