Cases
DRAUCKER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00133
Plaintiff: JAMES DRAUCKER
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CLEARFIELD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, CLEARFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Draucker v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01022
Plaintiff: James Draucker
Defendant: Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, Clearfield County District Attorney's Office, Clearfield County Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOULI v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al.
as 3:2023cv00096
Petitioner: SHYAM PRAVANI GOULI
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CLEARFIELD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, PA and CLEARFIELD COUNTY, PA PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE
Plaintiff: SHYAM PRANAMI GOULI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SPUCK v. CLEARFIELD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al
as 3:2017cv00002
Petitioner: DANIEL L. SPUCK
Respondent: CLEARFIELD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and BRIAN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COWDER v. THOMPSON et al
as 3:2012cv00109
Petitioner: MARK COWDER
Respondent: BRIAN THOMPSON , CLEARFIELD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STRAW v. WYNDER et al
as 3:2006cv00169
Petitioner: AARON J. STRAW
Respondent: JAMES T. WYNDER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and CLEARFIELD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WHITAKER v. PATRICK et al
as 3:2007cv00252
Petitioner: JOSEPH CLAIR WHITAKER
Defendant: GEORGE PATRICK
Respondent: CLEARFIELD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?