Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Purcell Bronson, et al v. John W. Kerestes, et al
as 10-1632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PURCELL BRONSON
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
BRENDA LYNN TRITT, THOMAS DERFLER, SHARON LUQUIS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
D. AMBRISTER and JOHN W. KERESTES
Debtor - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
O'BRIEN
MULLEN v. ZICKEFOOSE
as 1:2010cv00839
Petitioner:
MARTIN CLEMENT MULLEN
Respondent:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henry v. Karnes et al
as 3:2009cv01621
Plaintiff:
Ray Henry
Defendant:
Robert J. Karnes, Anthony J. Hauck, Timothy L. Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NAPOLI v. ELLIOTT et al
as 2:2009cv02618
Plaintiff:
MARK ALLEN NAPOLI
Defendant:
BRIAN ELLIOTT, DAVE HOSTETTER, SHARON LUQUIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dock v. Keister et al
as 4:2009cv00390
Plaintiff:
Edwin R. Dock
Defendant:
Timothy Keister, Anthony Clements, Lieutenant O'Rourke and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bronson v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2009cv00269
Plaintiff:
Purcell Bronson
Defendant:
John W. Kerestes, Brenda L. Tritt, Thomas Derfler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv05759
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Turner v. Karnes et al
as 3:2008cv02158
Plaintiff:
Edward Turner
Defendant:
Warden Karnes, Captain Ott, Michael Stuckey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pressley v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv02131
Plaintiff:
Sean Pressley
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, J. Beard, B. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gbeke Awala v. Rosemary Barkett, et al
as 08-4121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GBEKE MICHAEL AWALA
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSEMARY BARKETT, 11th Circuit Judge, SUSAN H. BLACK, PAUL D. CLEMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
