Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Selective Insurance Company of the Southeast v. Code Administrators, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Selective Insurance Company of the Southeast
Defendant:
Code Administrators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
EXP REALTY, LLC et al v. BOROUGH OF GLENOLDEN et al
as 2:2023cv04287
Plaintiff:
EXP REALTY, LLC and SUBURBAN REALTORS ALLIANCE
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF GLENOLDEN, BRIAN RAZZI, COMMONWEALTH CODE ENFORCEMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Platt v. Graham et al
as 1:2019cv01829
Defendant:
James Graham, R. Clem Malot, David Bolton and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Platt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Halchak et al v. Dorrance Township Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2018cv01285
Defendant:
Ken Fenstermacher, Code Inspections, Inc., Alan Snelson and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly A. Halchak and Anthony J. Halchak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
INDIRA et al v. GROFF et al
as 5:2014cv04050
Plaintiff:
THIRUVALAM INDIRA , MOOKAN PERIYASAMY and ASWIN GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
DENNIS R. GROFF , DOMINICK LOPEZ , RANDY MAURER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS et al v. CODE ELEVATOR, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv06505
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS and ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN
Defendant:
CODE ELEVATOR, INC. and STEPHEN VOGELMAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
THE CUMBERLAND INSURANCE GROUP et al v. CODE.SYS CODE CONSULTING, INC.
as 2:2009cv01303
Plaintiff:
THE CUMBERLAND INSURANCE GROUP and NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CODE.SYS CODE CONSULTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
