Cases 31 - 40 of 1,380
Buckner v. Coleman et al.
as 3:2023cv02390
Plaintiff:
Jeanie Buckner
Defendant:
Daniel Coleman, Jade Trimmer, Branson Brooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taper v. Branch et al
as 1:2023cv00806
Plaintiff:
Joshua Taper
Defendant:
Jennifer Branch, Sydney Greathouse, Pavan V. Parikh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Coleman v. Davidson County Sheriff Office
as 3:2023cv01275
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lewis Coleman, Jr.
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emma Coleman v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, et al
as 23-6044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMA COLEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, dba Wal-Mart No. 2548, STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and C & C DOORS, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
McGill et al v. Xponential Fitness LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03909
Plaintiff:
Shannon McGill, Gina Oliveira, Justin Curry and others
Defendant:
Xponential Fitness LLC, XPOF Assetco, LLC, AKT Franchise, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
John Coleman v. Kim Henderson
as 23-3938
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN C. COLEMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
KIM HENDERSON, Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution
Coleman v. Bard Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03847
Plaintiff:
Jordan Coleman
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Claude Coleman
as 23-3924
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CLAUDE COLEMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
