Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Seino v. Divris
as 22-1779
Petitioner / Appellant: CARLOS A. SEINO
Respondent / Appellee: COLETTE M. GOGUEN, Superintendent, North Central Correctional Institution at Gardner and MATTHEW DIVRIS, Superintendent, North Central Correctional Institution at Gardner
Durand v. Goguen
as 22-1292
Petitioner / Appellant: ERIC J. DURAND
Respondent / Appellee: COLETTE M. GOGUEN, Superintendent - NCCI
Veiovis v. Goguen
as 22-1216
Petitioner / Appellant: CAIUS VEIOVIS
Respondent / Appellee: COLETTE M. GOGUEN, Superintendent
Facella v. Goguen
as 21-1990
Petitioner / Appellant: JOSEPH FACELLA
Respondent / Appellee: COLETTE M. GOGUEN
Bourassa v. Armey, et al
as 21-1598
Plaintiff / Appellant: JON BOURASSA
Defendant: MASSCOR OPTICAL INDUSTRIES, MATTHEW DIVRIS, Superintendent at The North Central Correctional Institution, DAVID R. TOWER, Optical Industries Instructor and others
Defendant / Appellee: ASHELEE ARMEY, Optical Industries Instructor, JASON HAYDEN, Inner Parameter Security Officer and ASHLEE ARMEY, Optical Industries Instructor
Felton v. Marchilli
as 20-1426
Respondent / Appellee: COLETTE M. GOGUEN, Superintendent and RAYMOND MARCHILLI, Superintendent
Petitioner / Appellant: RICHARD FELTON
James v. Goguen
as 19-2215
Respondent / Appellee: COLETTE M. GOGUEN, Superintendent
Petitioner / Appellant: STEVEN JAMES
Strickland v. Goguen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2104
Petitioner / Appellant: JASON STRICKLAND
Respondent / Appellee: COLETTE M. GOGUEN, Superintendent NCCI Gardner
Steed v. Goguen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv12093
Respondent: Colette M. Goguen
Petitioner: Charles Tirek Steed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Durand v. Goguen
as 19-1724
Respondent / Appellee: COLETTE M. GOGUEN, Superintendent NCCI
Petitioner / Appellant: ERIC J. DURAND

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?