Cases 41 - 50 of 80
PLATT v. PETERS et al
as 1:2022cv05717
Petitioner:
DERRICK LEVON PLATT
Respondent:
COLETTE S. PETERS and MICHAEL KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dickson v. Garland
as 22-60503
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bryan K. Dickson
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, William Barr, Attorney General of the United States, Colette S. Peters, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Voits v. Brown et al
as 2:2022cv01365
Defendant:
Mss. Kelcie Main, Mss. Kate Brown, Shemia Fagan and others
Plaintiff:
Ivar Voits
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mounce v. Vitt et al
as 3:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
Heather Mae Mounce
Defendant:
Paul Charles Vitt, Tim Causey, Mike Gower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimsley v. Nike Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv10745
Plaintiff:
Robert Grimsley
Defendant:
Nike Corp., Phil Knight doing business as Nike Corp., Amazon Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner et al v. Brown et al
as 2:2021cv01256
Plaintiff:
Tyler Gardner and 1,700 John Does
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Colette S. Peters, Oregon Health Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Wagner v. Peters et al
as 3:2021cv01234
Plaintiff:
Frank Arnold Van Wagner
Defendant:
Colette S. Peters, Joseph Bugher, Joshua Highberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slight v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00925
Defendant:
Colette S. Peters, Sue Washburn, C. Kairos and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Martin Slight, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forter et al v. Brown et al
as 6:2021cv00478
Plaintiff:
Jacob Phillips, Joseph J. Gustin, III, Jack Caudy and others
Defendant:
Colette S. Peters and Governor Kate Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Peters et al
as 1:2021cv00446
Plaintiff:
George Lee Marshall, Jr.
Defendant:
Colette S. Peters and Steve Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
