Cases
BROWN v. COMMONWEALTH, PA
as 2:2022cv01920
Petitioner: ALEXANDER BROWN
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Floyd v. Commonwealth, PA State Attorney General et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01420
Plaintiff: Charles Floyd, Jr.
Defendant: Commonwealth, PA State Attorney General, Michael L. Rozman, Marie M. McNaughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIHEL v. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv06880
Plaintiff: JOSEPH DANIHEL
Defendant: OFFICE OF PRESIDENT, US HUD, US SENATOR PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IBN-HAMEED v. COMMONWEALTH, PA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2014cv06670
Petitioner: STEVEN SEIFUDDIN IBN-HAMEED
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH, PA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, GEORGE PAGANO, SANDRA URBAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Centralized Infractions Bureau, et al v. Yahya Abdul Malik
as 12-1178
Plaintiff - Appellee: CENTRALIZED INFRACTIONS BUREAU, COMMONWEALTH PA SUPERIOR COURT, COMMONWEALTH OF PA and others
Defendant - Appellant: YAHYA ABDUL MALIK, Family of Kamara, A Natural Person, In Propria Persona Sui Juris (Not to be confused with Nor Substituted with Pro Se) And not a statutory person
Pressley v. Commonwealth PA et al
as 3:2010cv00297
Petitioner: Dalacey Pressley
Respondent: SCI - Dallas, PA State Attorney General and Commonwealth PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. PRESENZA et al
as 2:2007cv01527
Petitioner: ALEXANDER BROWN
Respondent: LOUIS PRESENZA, COMMONWEALTH, PA and CITY OF PHILA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DRAYER v. COMMONWEALTH, PA.
as 2:2007cv01242
Plaintiff: JR DRAYER, JR.
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH, PA.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?