Cases 31 - 40 of 340
Santos v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2022cv10036
Petitioner:
Angel Santos
Respondent:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bey v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2021cv05176
Plaintiff:
Jamil Rasul Bey
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Charles D. Baker, Karyn E. Polito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2021cv12034
Plaintiff:
Petitioner
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Petitioner:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Santos v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2021cv12019
Petitioner:
Angel Santos
Respondent:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Foltz v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts,
as 1:2021cv11848
Plaintiff:
Charles Henry Ireland Foltz
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foltz v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2021cv11865
Petitioner:
Charles Henry Ireland Foltz
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ross v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2021cv11655
Petitioner:
Ashton M Ross
Respondent:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Barnstable Superior Court et al
as 1:2021cv11568
Plaintiff:
Steven Smith
Defendant:
Barnstable Superior Court, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Governor Charles Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2021cv11517
Petitioner:
Valentine Underwood
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sharif Bey v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2021cv11505
Plaintiff:
Tariff Sharif Bey
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
