Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Dias v. Cruz, et al
as 16-1373
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTONIO O. DIAS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY J. CRUZ, District Attorney of Plymouth County, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and MAURA T. HEALEY, Attorney General of Massachusetts
Thompson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2015cv13956
Petitioner:
Walter Thompson
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Paul Presler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Correa v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2015cv13700
Petitioner:
George Correa
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Igo v. Governor of Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 4:2015cv40088
Petitioner:
John Igo
Respondent:
Governor of Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Secretary Executive Office of Health and Human Services and Commissioner of Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosario v. Roden, et al
as 15-1143
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE ROSARIO
Respondent - Appellee:
GARY RODEN, Superintendent and MARTHA COAKLEY, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Spencer v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2014cv14108
Petitioner:
Barry Spencer
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Murray v. Warden Lewisburg USP, et al
as 14-4233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MURRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSIONER
Shippee v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2014cv13926
Petitioner:
Craig S. Shippee
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chisholm v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2014cv13812
Petitioner:
Edward J. Chisholm
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roby v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2014cv12832
Petitioner:
Randy Roby
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
