Cases 61 - 70 of 90
People of the State of California et al v. U.S. Department of Transportation et al
as 4:2017cv05439
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California , California Air Resources Board, State of Iowa and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Transportation, Elaine L. Chao, Federal Highway Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
People of the State of California, et al v. Perry, et al
as 4:2017cv03406
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California , State of New York , State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
James R. Perry , United States Department Of Energy and Air-Conditioning, Heating, & Refigeration Institute
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
LULAC, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 17-71636
Petitioner:
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, PESTICIDE ACTION NETWORK NORTH AMERICA, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and others
Respondent:
ANDREW WHEELER, Administrator of United States Environmental Protection Agency, SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator of United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor:
STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL., STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Amicus Curiae:
DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC, MIGRANT CLINICIANS NETWORK, HEALTH PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS and others
State of Washington, et al., v. Trump., et al
as 2:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
State of Washington , State of Oregon , State of California and others
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump , U.S. Department of Homeland Security , United States of America and others
Amicu:
Americans United for Separation of Church and State , American Civil Liberties Union of Washington (ACLU) , Service Employees International Union and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mahoney v. Federal Reserve Assocation et al
as 2:2016cv01599
Plaintiff:
John Francis Mahoney
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Assocation, Humana Hospital West Anaheim, Saint Jude Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Massachusetts, Commonwealth of v. Volkswagen AG et al
as 3:2016cv05088
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Defendant:
Volkswagen A.G. , Audi AG, Volkswagen Group of America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc v. USDC-CARIV
as 13-72611
:
In re: J-M MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
Petitioner:
J-M MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., DBA JM Eagle, AKA Seal A
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AKA Seal 1, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AKA Seal 2, STATE OF DELAWARE, AKA Seal 3 and others
United States of America et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 4:2012mc80286
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of Alabama , State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation , Bank of America, N.A. , Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
Beverly Sevcik, et al v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 12-17668
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF ALABAMA; STATE OF ALASKA; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF IDAHO; STATE OF MONTANA; STATE OF NEBRASKA; STATE OF OKLAHOMA; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; and STATE OF UTAH, COLAGE, HAWAII PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAREN CAFFERATA-JENKINS, GREG FLAMER, SARA GEIGER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN E. SANDOVAL, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Nevada, AMY HARVEY, in her official capacity as the County Clerk and Commissioner of Civil Marriages for Washoe County, Nevada, DIANA ALBA, in her official capacity as the County Clerk and Commissioner of Civil Marriages for Clark County, Nevada and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
COALITION FOR THE PROTECTION OF MARRIAGE
The State of California et al v. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05229
Plaintiff:
The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
