Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Etheridge v. Conagra Foods, Inc.
as 2:2009cv02523
Plaintiff:
Rocky M. Etheridge and Shannon Etheridge
Defendant:
Conagra Foods, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Butler et al v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00414
Plaintiff:
Robert Butler, Robert Butler, Sammie Coffer and others
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Richardson et al v. Conagra Foods, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00139
Plaintiff:
Winston Richardson and Paul Rogers
Defendant:
Conagra Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Armstrong v. Conagra Foods, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00619
Plaintiff:
Herbert E. Armstrong
Defendant:
Conagra Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jones et al v. ConAgra Foods, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00079
Plaintiff:
Harold Jones and Sharon Jones
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Marsh Supermarkets, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Autrey v. Conagra Foods Inc
as 1:2008cv00698
Defendant:
Conagra Foods Inc
Plaintiff:
Brandon Autrey
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hinkle v. Conagra Foods, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv00110
Plaintiff:
Ruth Hinkle and Ruth Hinkle
Defendant:
Conagra Foods, Inc., Conagra Foods Enterprise Services, Inc., Conagra Foods Food Ingredients Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Baker et al v. Conagra Foods, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00035
Plaintiff:
Linda Baker, Linda Baker, Charles Baker and others
Defendant:
Conagra Foods, Inc. and Food Lion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
