Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Conklin v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Mike Conklin
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Schelske et al v. Austin et al
as 6:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Robert Schelske, Huntley W. Bakich, Jr., Zakai Bufkin and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, Christine Wormuth, Yvette K. Bourcicot and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Walker et al v. City of Richardson, Texas et al
as 3:2022cv01164
Plaintiff:
Kayla Walker and David Conklin
Defendant:
City of Richardson, Texas, Gary Tittle, Jamie Gerhart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Case et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2021cv00163
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
Pamela Case and Anthony Conklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. City of Lubbock, Texas et al
as 5:2020cv00053
Defendant:
LVN Mann, Paul Cartwright, N. Ybarra and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conklin v. Corinth Health Care et al
as 4:2016cv00390
Plaintiff:
Harry Conklin
Defendant:
Corinth Health Care and THI of Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Reese v. Conklin et al
as 1:2016cv00058
Defendant:
Tonya Spaeth Ahlschwede, Hilargo Cantu, Shannon Conklin and others
Plaintiff:
Idris M. Reese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Allen et al
as 6:2015cv00663
Plaintiff:
Petrie Robinson
Defendant:
Ricky Allen and Tara E Conklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015mc00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
