Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaquemines Parish v. ConocoPhillips
as 23-30336
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Louisiana State, Ex Rel Jeff Landry and Louisiana State, Through Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant / Appellant:
ConocoPhillips Company, Named as Successor in Interest to Conoco, Incorporated, Louisiana Land and Exploration Company, L.L.C., Named as Successor in Interest to The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company, Chevron USA Holdings, Incorporated, Named as Successor in Interest to Texaco E & P, Incorporated and Texaco, Incorporated and others
Plaquemines Prsh v. ConocoPhillips
as 23-30303
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor / Appellee:
Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris
Defendant / Appellant:
ConocoPhillips Company, As Successor in Interest to Conoco, Incorporated, Exxon Mobil Corporation, As Successor in Interest to Exxon Corporation and Humble Oil and Refining Company, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., As Successor in Interest to Gulf Oil Corporation and The California Company and others
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron USA
as 23-30290
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris
Defendant / Appellant:
Chevron USA, Incorporated, As Successor in Interest to Gulf Oil Corporation and The California Company, ConocoPhillips Company, As Successor in Interest to Conoco, Incorporated and Chevron Pipe Line Company, As Successor in Interest to Gulf Refining Company
Plaquemines Prsh v. Chevron USA
as 23-30153
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish and Louisiana State, Ex Rel Parish of Plaquemines
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Louisiana State
Defendant / Appellant:
Chevron USA, Incorporated, Successor in Interest to The California Company and the Chevron Oil Company, ConocoPhillips Company, Named as Successor in Interest to Conoco, Incorporated and Shell Oil Company
Stephanie Howard v. Fina Oil & Chemical Company, et al
as 16-60157
Appellant:
STEPHANIE HOWARD
Appellee:
FINA OIL & CHEMICAL COMPANY, MURPHY OIL USA, INCORPORATED, VINTAGE PETROLEUM, INCORPORATED and others
Stephanie Howard v. Fina Oil & Chemical Company, et al
as 16-60092
Appellee:
FINA OIL & CHEMICAL COMPANY, MURPHY OIL USA, INCORPORATED, VINTAGE PETROLEUM, INCORPORATED, now Vintage Petroleum, L.L.C. and others
Appellant:
STEPHANIE HOWARD
Fox v. R&D Conoco Incorporated
as 4:2015cv00101
Plaintiff:
Amy M Fox
Defendant:
R&D Conoco Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JACOBSON et al v. TRINIDAD CORPORATED et al
as 2:2011cv33888
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
TRINIDAD CORPORATED, AMERICAN FOREIGN S.S. CORPORATION, AMERICAN TRADING AND PRODUCTION CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BARTEL v. PEEBLES et al
as 2:2010cv37925
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL
Defendant:
DAVID C. PEEBLES , FARRELL LINES INC , FEDERAL BULK CARRIERS, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BARTEL et al v. ALBATROSS STEAMSHIP COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv37874
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
ALBATROSS STEAMSHIP COMPANY, AMERICAN FOREIGN S.S. CORPORATION , CENTRAL GULF LINES STEAMSHIP and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
TEXACO INC , AMERICAN FOREIGN S.S. CORPORATION, CENTRAL GULF LINES STEAMSHIP and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , KEENE CORP , EAGLE-PICHER IND INC and others
Cross_claimant:
TEXACO INC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
