Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Burgum et al
as 2:2026cv02474
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Columbia Riverkeeper, Conservation Law Foundation and others
Defendant:
Douglas Burgum, Kevin Lilly, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
RENEW Northeast, et al v. United States Department of the Interior, et al
as 26-1731
Plaintiff:
RENEW NORTHEAST, ALLIANCE FOR CLEAN ENERGY NEW YORK, RENEWABLE NORTHWEST and others
Defendant:
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR, DOUGLAS JAMES BURGUM, Secretary of the Interior, in the official capacity, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Interested Party:
CITIZENS CAMPAIGN FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, ENVIRONMENTAL LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2026cv01528
Plaintiff:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., R. ZACK KLYVER and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, DOUG BURGUM, HOWARD LUTNICK and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Alliance of Nurses for Healthy Environments et al v. Zeldin
as 3:2026cv03118
Plaintiff:
Alliance of Nurses for Healthy Environments, American Lung Association, American Public Health Association and others
Defendant:
Lee Michael Zeldin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
Urbinati, Jr. v. Lutnick et al
as 1:2026cv02884
Plaintiff:
Joseph Urbinati, Jr.
Defendant:
Howard Lutnick and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Intervenor:
Conservation Law Foundation, Whale and Dolphin Conservation, Inc., Center For Biological Diversity and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Air Alliance Houston, et al v. EPA, et al
as 26-1070
Petitioner:
Air Alliance Houston, Alliance of Nurses for Healthy Environments, American Academy of Pediatrics and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Lee M. Zeldin, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of North Dakota, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Amicus Curiae:
Government Accountability & Oversight
State of New York, et al v. Trump, et al
as 26-1174
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in the official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES, DOUGLAS JAMES BURGUM, in the official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and others
Interested Party:
CITIZENS CAMPAIGN FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES NY and others
American Public Health Association, et al v. EPA, et al
as 26-1037
Petitioner:
American Public Health Association, Alliance of Nurses for Healthy Environments, American Lung Association and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Lee M. Zeldin, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
John Worthington, State of West Virginia, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Amicus Curiae:
Government Accountability & Oversight, Government Oversight & Education, d/b/a Protect the Public's Trust, Ted Cruz, U.S. Senator and others
Renew Northeast et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 1:2025cv13961
Plaintiff:
RENEW NORTHEAST, Alliance for Clean Energy New York, RENEWABLE NORTHWEST and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Douglas Burgum, Bureau of Land Management and others
Amicus Curiae:
Campaign for the Environment, Conservation Law Foundation, Environmental League of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. et al v. Vorsteveld Farm, LLP
as 2:2025cv00916
Plaintiff:
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. and Vermont Natural Resources Council
Defendant:
Vorsteveld Farm, LLP
Evaluator:
ENE Evaluator
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
