Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Consol Pennsylvania Coal Co v. Randall McMillin, et al
as 23-3069
Petitioner:
CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL CO
Respondent:
RANDALL F. MCMILLIN and DIRECTOR OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Consol PA Coal Company LLC, et al v. Director Office of Workers Compensation Programs U, et al
as 23-2518
Petitioner:
CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL CO LLC and CONSOL ENERGY INC
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and BRYAN C. SNYDER
Consol Pennsylvania Coal Co, et al v. Director Office of Workers Compensation Programs, et al
as 23-1892
Petitioner:
CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL CO and CONSOL ENERGY INC
Respondent:
STEPHEN M. HELA and DIRECTOR OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Consol Pennsylvania Coal Co v. Mahalaxmi Continental Limited, et al
as 23-1383
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL CO
Defendant / Appellant:
MAHALAXMI CONTINENTAL LTD, MAHALAXMI INDIA PRIVATE LTD, MAHALAXMI ASSOCIATES PRIVATE LTD and others
Consol Pennsylvania Coal Co, et al v. Director Office of Workers Compensation Programs, et al
as 23-1351
Petitioner:
CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL CO and CONSOL ENERGY INC
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ALBERT MICHALIDES
Consol Pennsylvania Coal Co v. MSHR, et al
as 22-2191
Petitioner:
CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL CO, L.L.C.
Respondent:
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION and SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Consol Pennsylvania Coal Co v. MSHR, et al
as 16-2643
Petitioner:
CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL CO
Respondent:
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION and SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
CULP v. CONSOL ENERGY, INC, et al
as 2:2014cv01597
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CULP
Defendant:
CONSOL ENERGY, INC. and CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL CO.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
