Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Anderson v. Parker et al (INMATE 2)
as 4:2022cv01539
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Anderson
Defendant:
O. Parker, D. Dent, C. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Holcomb et al
as 2:2022cv01527
Plaintiff:
Elmore Cook, Jr
Defendant:
Holcomb, Coats, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Parker et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Anderson
Defendant:
O. Parker, D. Dent, C. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Rambo et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Anderson
Defendant:
Officer Rambo, Officer Cook, Officer Lett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Brown et al
as 2:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Defendant:
R Brown, W Cook, R Rambo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McConico v. Cook et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
James McConico, Jr.
Defendant:
Mary Cook, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riddle v. Cook et al
as 1:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Dion Edward Riddle
Defendant:
Mary Cook, Smith, Daily and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McConico v. Cook et al
as 1:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
James McConico, Jr.
Defendant:
Mary Cook, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00800
Plaintiff:
Marquez Cornelius Vaughn
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Matthew Cooke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riddle v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00343
Plaintiff:
Dion Edward Riddle
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Ms. Banks, Kayla M. Albrition and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.