Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Salerno v. Progressive Speciality Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Cosmo Salerno
Defendant:
Progressive Speciality Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. 1713 EC LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02066
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
1713 EC LLC doing business as COSMO ON CARSON, DANIEL R. CASTAGNA and FRANK A. CATROPPA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
Agostino et al v. Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00725
Plaintiff:
Cosmo G. Agostino , Joanne M. Agostino , Tina M. MacKenzie and others
Defendant:
Fulton Bank, National Association , Riverview Bank and Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LOSCO et al v. POWELSON et al
as 2:2015cv02798
Plaintiff:
COSMO LOSCO , MARYANNE LOSCO and CD LOSCO, LLC
Defendant:
ROBERT F. POWELSON, JOHN F. COLEMAN, JR., JAMES H. CAWLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INNOVELIS, INC. v. AUCH et al
as 2:2015cv02661
Plaintiff:
INNOVELIS, INC.
Defendant:
AUCH, BOOMPOW INTERNATIONAL, CO2CREA and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Cosby v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2015cv00353
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Cosmo Cosby
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Jason Seeba and J Kitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cosby v. Ebbert et al
as 3:2014cv02054
Plaintiff:
Gregory Cosmo Cosby
Defendant:
David J. Ebbert and David J. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cosby v. Ebbert
as 3:2014cv01804
Petitioner:
Gregory D Cosmo Cosby
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FAZIO v. USA
as 2:2013cv00522
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
COSMO FAZIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
PHOENICIA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT, LLC v. NEW YORK COSMOS, LLC
as 5:2012cv00772
Plaintiff:
PHOENICIA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
Defendant:
NEW YORK COSMOS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
