Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hadley et al v. Washington State Patrol et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv05776
Plaintiff: Vencine Timone Hadley and Mary Flo Horan
Defendant: Washington State Patrol, John R. Batiste, Evan Tippets and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
United States v. Hemion et al
as 2:2016mc00055
Plaintiff: United States
Defendant: Aylene Catherine Hemion
Garnishee: Cowlitz Indian Tribe
Koch v. Cowlitz Indian Tribe et al
as 3:2015cv05570
Plaintiff: Michael William Koch
Defendant: Cowlitz Indian Tribe, Nancy Osborne and Randy Russell
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Confederated Tribes, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 15-5033
Plaintiff - Appellee: Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon
Plaintiff - Appellant: Clark County, Washington, In case no.: 13-cv-850, City of Vancouver, Washington, In case no.: 13-cv-850, Citizens Against Reservation Shopping (Cars), In case no.: 13-cv-850 and others
Defendant - Appellee: Sally Jewell, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, Kevin K. Washburn, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs of the United States Department of the Interior, Stanley M. Speaks, in his official capacity as Regional Director, Northwest Region, of the Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Cowlitz Indian Tribe, a federally recognized Indian Tribe
Confederated Tribes of the Gr v. Sally Jewell, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5326
Plaintiff - Appellant: Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon
Plaintiff - Appellee: Clark County, Washington, In case no.: 13-cv-850, City of Vancouver, Washington, In case no.: 13-cv-850, Citizens Against Reservation Shopping (Cars), In case no.: 13-cv-850 and others
Defendant - Appellee: Sally Jewell, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, Kevin K. Washburn, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs of the United States Department of the Interior, Stanley M. Speaks, in his official capacity as Regional Director, Northwest Region, of the Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Cowlitz Indian Tribe, a federally recognized Indian Tribe
George Umtuch v. Cowlitz Indian Tribe, et al
as 13-36085
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGE M. UMTUCH, State ex rel Chief
Defendant - Appellee: COWLITZ INDIAN TRIBE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Secretary: Awaiting Presidential appointment at press time and others
Umtuch v. Cowlitz Indian Tribe et al
as 2:2013cv01536
Defendant: Cowlitz Indian Tribe, Department of the Interior, Chief Stanley Speaks and others
Plaintiff: State ex rel Chief George Michael Umtuch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Department of the Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv06086
Plaintiff: Thomas P. Hill, Jr.
Defendant: Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs and Cowlitz Indian Tribe
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE GRAND RONDE COMMUNITY OF OREGON v. SALAZAR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00284
Plaintiff: CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE GRAND RONDE COMMUNITY OF OREGON
Defendant: KEN SALAZAR , LARRY ECHO HAWK , STANLEY M. SPEAKS and others
Movant: COWLITZ INDIAN TRIBE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
CLARK COUNTY, WASHINGTON et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00278
Plaintiff: CLARK COUNTY, WASHINGTON , CITY OF VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON , CITIZENS AGAINST RESERVATION SHOPPING (CARS) and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR , KENNETH SALAZAR , BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Movant: COWLITZ INDIAN TRIBE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?