Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Larsen v. Coworx Staffing Services, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01795
Plaintiff:
Clifford Larsen
Defendant:
Coworx Staffing Services, LLC, Coworx Personnel, LLC, Bulgari Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr
Galvez v. CoWorx Staffing Services LLC et al
as 3:2021cv07435
Plaintiff:
Lysette Galvez
Defendant:
CoWorx Staffing Services LLC, Michael Epstein, Robert Badolato and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Webber v. CoWorx Staffing Services, LLC
as 1:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
Webber DeQuentin and DeQuentin Webber
Defendant:
CoWorx Staffing Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04686
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Seth Shapiro v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 2:2019cv08972
Plaintiff:
Seth Shapiro
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Sequential Technology International, LLC
Petitioner:
CoWorx Staffing Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BELL v. COWORX STAFFING SERVICES, LLC
as 5:2018cv02833
Plaintiff:
ROBIN BELL
Defendant:
SYNCHRONOSS, INC. and COWORX STAFFING SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Salvado Velez v. CoWorx Staffing Services, LLC
as 5:2018cv00651
Defendant:
CoWorx Staffing Services, LLC and DOES
Plaintiff:
Salvado Velez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
