Cases 31 - 40 of 61
TAYLOR v. HANKS
as 2:2011cv00052
Respondent:
ALAN FINNAN and CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner:
JOSEPH ERNEST TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOODY v. HANKS
as 2:2010cv00171
Respondent:
CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner:
JOSHUA MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JEFFERS v. HANKS et al
as 1:2010cv00264
Defendant:
JOHN FLOWERS, S GARD, CRAIG HANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffers v. Hanks et al
as 3:2010cv00071
Plaintiff:
Leroy R Jeffers
Defendant:
Craig Hanks, John Flowers, S Gard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain v. Lemmon et al
as 1:2009cv00220
Plaintiff:
Joe Howard McClain
Defendant:
Bruce Lemmon, Basinger, Charles Bud Meeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHILDS v. WRIGLEY et al
as 1:2009cv00981
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DALE CHILDS
Defendant:
JEFFREY WRIGLEY, CRAIG HANKS, TRINA RANDALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOODY v. HANKS
as 2:2008cv00338
Petitioner:
JOSHUA MOODY
Respondent:
CRAIG HANKS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GERALD et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2008cv00706
Plaintiff:
DONZELL GERALD
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, J. DAVID DONAHUE, CRAIG HANKS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Scott v. Donahue et al
as 3:2008cv00206
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott
Defendant:
David Donahue, Dr Anita Glasson, Dr Eli and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FERGUSON et al v. HANKS et al
as 1:2008cv00140
Plaintiff:
HARRY E. FERGUSON, ALVERTON LERCH, MICHAEL HART and others
Defendant:
CRAIG HANKS, NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
