Cases 1 - 10 of 170
Stinson v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Mark Yates, Wall & Associates, Inc., John P. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Blair v. Crawford
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Adaruis Blair
Defendant:
f/n/u Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colbert, Jr. v. Crawford
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Kipling Colbert, Jr.
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01113
Plaintiff:
Chase Andrew Christopher Smith
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc. doing business as Trousdale Turner Correctional Facility and Sgt. Cortney Q. Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baucom, Jr v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2023cv00963
Plaintiff:
Terry Baucom, Jr
Defendant:
Core Civic, f/n/u Mitchell, f/n/u Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00823
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adams
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Damon Hininger, Steve Conry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
United States of America v. Crawford
as 2:2023cv02441
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christopher Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
United States of America v. Crawford
as 2:2023cv02440
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christopher Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
