Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rogers v. CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02937
Defendant:
CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC.
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Greene v. CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01211
Defendant:
CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Grady Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Phoenix Insurance Company v. Gallagher Asphalt Corporation et al
as 4:2018cv11687
Defendant:
CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc., Ragnar Benson Construction, LLC and Gallagher Asphalt Corporation
Plaintiff:
The Phoenix Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
WINTER SERVICES, INC. v. CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC.
as 2:2017cv13501
Plaintiff:
WINTER SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC.
Counter_claimant:
CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC.
Counter_defendant:
WINTER SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Navigators Specialty Insurance Company et al v. TD Group, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv03229
Plaintiff:
Navigators Specialty Insurance Company and Starr Indemnity & Liability Company
Defendant:
TD Group, LLC and CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. TD Group, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv02744
Plaintiff:
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
TD Group, LLC and CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Sussex Insurance Company v. Central Lift Maintenance Group, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01095
Plaintiff:
Sussex Insurance Company
Defendant:
Central Lift Maintenance Group, LLC, CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc. and Ernest J. Errico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
INTEGRATED DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC. v. CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC.
as 2:2013cv00994
Plaintiff:
INTEGRATED DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
