Cases 1 - 10 of 14
(PS) Narayan v. Brown et al
as 2:2021cv02385
Plaintiff:
Prakash Narayan
Defendant:
Brown, Judy Hesrey, Kelvin Culhan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stein v. Callidus Software Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01453
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Callidus Software Inc. , Charles M. Boesenberg , Leslie J. Stretch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Franchi v. Callidus Software Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01443
Defendant:
Kevin M. Klausmeyer, Leslie J. Stretch, Nina L. Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Franchi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
(PS) Altstatt et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2018cv00150
Defendant:
Superior Court of the State of California, Sacramento County, Robert C. Hight, Julia Mason and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Altstatt and Kim Eileen Glazzard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Culhane et al
as 2:2017cv00711
Plaintiff:
Mariet Timothy Ford
Defendant:
Kevin R. Culhane and Anne Marie Schubert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Marlette et al
as 2:2014cv01483
Petitioner:
Maurice Muhammad
Respondent:
Patrick Marlette, Laurie Earl, Jan Scully and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Culhane v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2014cv00076
Plaintiff:
Kevin Culhane
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company and Ametek, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Honeyville Grain Inc v. Culhane Inc
as 8:2009cv01036
Plaintiff:
Honeyville Grain Inc and Honeyville Grain Inc
Defendant:
Culhane Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02268
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01787
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
