Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Tankesly v. TN Department of Corrections et al (PSLC1)
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Calvin-Otis Tankesly, Jr.
Defendant:
TN Department of Corrections, Lisa Helton, Lee Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Westley v. Brandeshawn Harris, et al
as 23-3177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES WESTLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN BRANDESHAWN HARRIS, WARDEN LASHANN EPPINGER, MICHAEL BEEBE and others
Interested Party:
STATE OF OHIO
Westley v. Harris et al
as 4:2021cv01672
Plaintiff:
James Westley
Defendant:
Warden Brandeshawn Harris, Warden LaShann Eppinger, Michael Beebe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cupp v. Roseberry
as 0:2016cv00135
Plaintiff:
Steven O. Cupp
Defendant:
Cynthia W. Roseberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cupp v. USA
as 6:2016cv00238
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jarrod L. Cupp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Anthony DeNoma v. John Kasich, et al
as 16-3839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY DENOMA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN R. KASICH, TED STRICKLAND, GARY C. MOHR, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) and others
DeNoma v. Kasich et al
as 1:2015cv00594
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeNoma
Defendant:
John R. Kasich, Ted Strickland, Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demery v. Easterling et al
as 2:2013cv00209
Petitioner:
Timothy Lee Demery
Respondent:
Joseph Easterling, Robert E Cupp and K.C. Baedwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demery v. Easterling et al
as 1:2013cv01011
Petitioner:
Timothy Lee Demery
Respondent:
Joseph Easterling, Robert E. Cupp and K.C. Baedwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson et al v. Cupp et al
as 2:2012cv00198
Plaintiff:
Robert H Johnson and Jeanette P Johnson
Defendant:
Robert E Cupp, Robin R Gilbert, Jeffrey Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
