Cases 1 - 10 of 12
United States v. Curtis Smith
as 21-1104
Defendant / Appellant:
Curtis Lee Smith
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Curtis Smith v. Wood, et al
as 20-12918
Defendant / Appellee:
HILL, individually and in his official capacity as a Correctional Officer-Food Supervisor at USP-ATLANTA, WOOD, individually and in his official capacity as warden of the United States Pentientiary Atlanta ("USP ATLANTA"), DAWSON, individually and in his official capacity as Correctional officer at USP-ATLANTA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS LEE SMITH
Smith v. Wood et al
as 1:2019cv03673
Defendant:
Hill, V. Moreno, Carmen Galindo and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Harmon et al
as 1:2019cv00330
Defendant:
Jones, Dawson, Warden Harmon and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Warden, USP Atlanta
as 1:2017cv01317
Petitioner:
Curtis Lee Smith
Respondent:
Warden, USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Coleman et al
as 1:2017cv00979
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Smith
Defendant:
Coleman, Holt, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cordona et al
as 1:2016cv01567
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Smith
Defendant:
Cordona, Hollinger, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Warden, USP- Atlanta
as 1:2016cv01230
Petitioner:
Curtis Lee Smith
Respondent:
Warden, USP- Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Curtis Lee Smith v. A.c. And S., Inc. (armstrong Con, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-83217
Defendant:
A.c. And S., Inc. (armstrong Con
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Smith
SMITH et al v. AQUA-CHEM INC et al
as 2:2007cv64680
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LEE SMITH and MARY E. SMITH
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM INC, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC INC., CERTAINTEED CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
