Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Carrasco et al v. City of Joliet et al
as 1:2023cv15572
Plaintiff:
Adela Carrasco, Eric Raya, Kiera Martinez and others
Defendant:
City of Joliet, A. Adams, Lawrence Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cagle v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06191
Plaintiff:
Shelie Cagle
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Namaste Laboratories LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jenkins v. Cagle et al
as 1:2023cv03806
Plaintiff:
William J. Jenkins
Defendant:
Michael Cagle, Joliet Police Department, City of Joliet, IL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00322
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hampton v. Cagle et al
as 4:2020cv04210
Plaintiff:
Demara Hampton
Defendant:
Randy Cagle, Inamte Services Corporation and Inmate Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cagle v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00171
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kemo Cagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHESTERFIELD v. CAGLE HEATING AND COOLING, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00429
Defendant:
BRADLEY J. CAGLE and CAGLE HEATING AND COOLING, INC.
Plaintiff:
BERT G. CHESTERFIELD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ross et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01758
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ross and Krystal Cagle Ross
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kent v. Cagle et al
as 1:2015cv07642
Plaintiff:
Jemell Kent
Defendant:
Officer M. Cagle, Officer E. Sailsbery, Unknown Flossmoor Police Officer Number One and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
