Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Cagle v. National Indemnity Company of the South et al
as 2:2023cv00140
Plaintiff: Freddie Cagle
Defendant: National Indemnity Company of the South and Old Republic Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Type: Contract Insurance
Cagle v. Harmony Group Canton, LLC
as 1:2022cv02182
Plaintiff: Jeffeory Cagle
Defendant: Harmony Group Canton, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01570
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Cagle v. Wesco Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv00052
Defendant: Isidro Alex Lobaina Loyola, Wesco Insurance Company, First Time Transport, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Freddie Cagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cagle et al v. Newton County, GA
as 1:2019cv05408
Plaintiff: Bobby Cagle, Ralph "Trey" Stewart, III and Brian Massey
Defendant: Newton County, GA
HOGAN v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2019cv00135
Plaintiff: RICKY LAMAR HOGAN
Defendant: STATE OF GEORGIA, EDMUND J BAZAR, JR, HUGH SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER et al v. DIXON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00058
Defendant: Marion County Elections Supervisor, ANTHONY DIXON, Angelique Ludlam and others
Plaintiff: Sarah N. Dixon, N. R., Dinah D. Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker et al
as 2:2018cv00150
Petitioner: Nema Mobley, William Cagle, Dennis Robichaud and others
Respondent: TDS Telecom Service, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 4
Ryte et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00186
Plaintiff: Amanda Ryte , Sean Scott , Tonia Arpke and others
Defendant: Express Courier International, Inc. and EMP LSO Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00183
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?