Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
(PS) Santillan v. California Bar Examiners We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00571
Plaintiff: Chelsie M. Santillan
Defendant: California Bar Examiners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04153
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
(PC) Nguyen v. Stoller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01157
Plaintiff: Dai Nguyen
Defendant: John Stoller, Erin Radekin, Gina Le and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palacios Lopez et al v. Coatzingo Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04521
Plaintiff: Haida Sarmiento, Jeny Catalina Arcos Perez, Dulce Karen Palacios Martinez and others
Defendant: Rufino Zapata and Coatzingo Enterprises, Inc. doing business as California Bar and Taqueria
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Palacios Lopez et al v. Coatzingo Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07881
Plaintiff: Haida Sarmiento, Jeny Catalina Arcos Perez, Dulce Karen Palacios Martinez and others
Defendant: Rufino Zapata and Coatzingo Enterprises, Inc. doing business as California Bar and Taqueria
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Walters v. State of Florida et al
as 0:2020cv61671
Defendant: Ashley Moody, Florida Department of Revenue, County of San Diego and others
Plaintiff: Bryan Walters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv04826
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Eddie Santana v. California Bar Examiners, et al
as 19-56283
Plaintiff / Appellant: EDDIE SANTANA
Defendant / Appellee: CALIFORNIA BAR EXAMINERS and CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT
Eddie Santana v. California Bar Examiners et al
as 2:2019cv07484
Defendant: California Bar Examiners and California Supreme Court
Plaintiff: Eddie Santana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Taha Abouramadan v. USDC-CALA
as 19-72070
Not Classified By Court: VERIZON WIRELESS, INC., In re: TAHA ABOURAMADAN, KELLY B. HANKER and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Petitioner: TAHA ABOURAMADAN, AKA Taha Ramadan

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?