Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Sheets v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II et al
as 5:2024cv00518
Petitioner:
Daniel Sheets
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II and California Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Devin Wade v. California Parole Board
as 5:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Devin Wade
Defendant:
California Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Bizhko v. McKinnon et al
as 2:2021cv01137
Defendant:
Thomas McKinnon, CDCR, California Parole Board North Division and others
Plaintiff:
Rusian A. Bizhko and Ruslan A. Bizhko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddie Clay v. California Parole Board, et al
as 20-55363
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD S. KENNEDY, Judge, in official capacity and CALIFORNIA PAROLE BOARD
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDDIE BERNARD CLAY
Eddie Bernard Clay v. California Parole Board et al
as 2:2020cv02682
Defendant:
California Parole Board and Donald S. Kennedy
Plaintiff:
Eddie Bernard Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Swon v. California Parole Board, et al
as 19-56165
Respondent / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA PAROLE BOARD, SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT and CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES SWON
James Swon v. California Parole Board et al
as 2:2019cv07005
Respondent:
State Supreme Court, Sacramento Superior Court and California Parole Board
Petitioner:
James Swon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Magee v. Castello et al
as 4:2019cv04340
Respondent:
California Parole Board Judges and J. Castello
Petitioner:
Ruchell Cinque Magee- PREFILING ORDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Magee v. Castello et al
as 2:2019cv01182
Respondent:
California Parole Board Judges and J. Castello
Petitioner:
Ruchell Cinque Magee- PREFILING ORDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kabede v. Brown et al
as 2:2016cv01765
Plaintiff:
Wondiyrad Kabede
Defendant:
Gary Brown, Kamala Harris, California Parole Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
