Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Calloway v. Monsanto Company (TV1)
as 3:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Sam W Calloway and Sam Calloway
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Calloway v. Dixon
as 2:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Doris Calloway
Defendant:
Chance Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel et al v. Neff et al
as 2:2021cv02511
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus D: Daniel and Wenona Calloway Daniel
Defendant:
Steven S: Neff, Christopher D: Poole, Deanora J: Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calloway-Armstrong et al v. Clarksville Police Department et al
as 3:2019cv00779
Defendant:
Metro Police Department, Clarksville Police Department, Ion Chaney and others
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Rachel Northern and Tyson Dion Calloway-Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Christian v. Christian et al
as 3:2017cv00809
Plaintiff:
Tonya Christian
Defendant:
Shonda Reynolds Christian, Cleopatra Gator, Billie Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edoho-Eket v. Perryman et al
as 3:2016cv03260
Plaintiff:
Udeme Edoho-Eket
Defendant:
Alastair Perryman, Davidson Cty. Juvenile Court, Sheila Calloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calloway v. Bond et al
as 1:2015cv01036
Plaintiff:
Cortez Montrell Calloway
Defendant:
Melvin Bond, Tonya Fisher, Cedrick Tyus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wynn v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 3:2013cv00107
Plaintiff:
Tommy E. Wynn, Jr.
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Duane Calloway and Trish Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Thrasher et al
as 3:2010cv00963
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Hudson
Defendant:
Dennis Thrasher , f/n/u Calloway , Sonya Troutt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Calloway v. Chao
as 3:2007cv00340
Plaintiff:
James Calloway
Defendant:
Elaine L Chao
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
