Cases 11 - 20 of 47
CALLOWAY v. BOROUGH OF PITCAIRN et al
as 2:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
ALLYSON CALLOWAY
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF PITCAIRN, MARGARET STEVICK, SCOTT FARALLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REASON v. HASSMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE et al
as 2:2021cv00783
Plaintiff:
MELVIN REASON, JR.
Defendant:
GREGORY CALLOWAY, HASSMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE and ROBERT M. SLIMM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calloway v. Bauman et al
as 1:2020cv02337
Plaintiff:
Edmond Calloway
Defendant:
Correctional Officer S. Beaver, John Wetzel, Willliam Nicklow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CALLOWAY v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2018cv05133
Respondent:
THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, SCI-COAL TOWNSHIP and ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
EDMOND CALLOWAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CALLOWAY v. ATRIUM MEDICAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
WILLIE CALLOWAY
Defendant:
ATRIUM MEDICAL CORPORATION, MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR US SALES, LLC and GETINGE AB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CALLOWAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv01635
Petitioner:
MIKHAIL CALLOWAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Calloway et al
as 3:2015cv00178
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Frances M. Calloway, Norma J. Campbell, Mary C. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TATUM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv01814
Plaintiff:
DENISE TATUM, BOBBY E. ABRAMS, JR., STEFON L. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
CALLOWAY v. BOURGHINI et al
as 2:2012cv01276
Plaintiff:
TORIAN CALLOWAY
Defendant:
DANTE BOURGHINI, DENNIS CHAKEY, MICHAEL LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
