Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Thornton v. Pittman
as 23-10098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shedrick Thornton
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Michael Pittman, FNU Doyle, Court Coordinator, FNU Brown, Sheriff and others
Thornton v. Pittman et al
as 3:2023cv00129
Petitioner:
Shedrick Thornton
Respondent:
Michael Pittman, FNU Doyle, FNU Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Betts v. Johnson
as 21-30766
Petitioner / Appellant:
Darrin Lashaon Betts
Respondent / Appellee:
Calvin Johnson, Warden, Federal Correctional Complex Pollock
Herbert HinesIn re: Herbert Hines
as 21-30663
Petitioner:
In re: Herbert Hines
Respondent:
Calvin Johnson, United States Parole Commission and Patricia K. Cushwa
Robinson v. Ward et al
as 3:2021cv00607
Defendant:
Phillip Parrier, Ernest White, Demareus Ward and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coco et al v. Hexion, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00661
Plaintiff:
Jessica Favorite, Jonathan Johnson, Lashondria Johnson and others
Defendant:
LEAAF Environmental, LLC, Lanxess Solutions US, Inc., Jesco Environmental & Geotechnical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Garcia v. South Central Regional et al
as 1:2020cv00973
Defendant:
Counselor South Central Regional, U S P Pollock, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alberto Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Gray v. Calvin Johnson, Warden
as 20-30221
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID FURTADO GRAY, also known as Dawud Ibn Furtado
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON, WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX POLLOCK
Lovelle Lang v. Calvin Johnson, Warden
as 19-31063
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON, WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX POLLOCK
Petitioner / Appellant:
LOVELLE LANG
Brenson Stovall v. Calvin Johnson, Warden
as 19-31061
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON, WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX POLLOCK
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRENSON STOVALL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
