Cases 1 - 10 of 238
Toledo Canino et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv01129
Plaintiff:
Ruth Toledo Canino, Nelson De Leon Camacho and conjugal partnership between Mrs. Toledo and Mr. De Leon
Defendant:
United States of America, JOHN DOE, Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Camacho-Duran
as 3:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Fidel Camacho-Duran
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Ramirez-Camacho
as 24-1031
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JULIO IRVING RAMIREZ-CAMACHO
US v. Camacho-Duran
as 23-1977
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
FIDEL CAMACHO-DURAN, a/k/a El Flaco
Santos-Camacho v. US
as 23-1917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN BARTOLOME SANTOS-CAMACHO
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
LEWIS N. JACK
Adedeji v. Bank of America, et al
as 23-1837
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEHINDE OLATUNJI ADEDEJI
Plaintiff:
WOODRON INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, HARR TOYOTA, Car Dealer, KNIGHT-DIK INSURANCE, Insurance Agency and others
US v. Cortez-Benitez
as 23-1781
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
RAUL ALEJANDRO CORTEZ-BENITEZ, a/k/a Raul Alejandro Cortez
Interested Party:
JESSICA CARRERO-CAMACHO
United States v. Pagan-Camacho et al
as 3:2023cv01459
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
Cesar Pagan-Camacho and Liza Ramirez De Arellano-Oliver
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
US v. Hernandez-Camacho
as 23-1482
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
YABDIER HERNANDEZ-CAMACHO, a/k/a Javdiel Hernandez, a/k/a Finito
Interested Party:
ALVARO TORRES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
