Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Jones v. Camden Development, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04745
Plaintiff:
Jay Jones
Defendant:
Camden Development, Inc. doing business as Camden Midtown Atlanta Apartments and John Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04040
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Camden Development Inc v. Tolbert
as 3:2023cv01293
Plaintiff:
Camden Development Inc
Defendant:
Yahudah Tolbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Doe v. Camden Summit Partnership, LP, et al
as 1:2022cv20271
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Camden Summit Partnership, LC, Camden Summit Partnership, LP doing business as Camden Brickell, Camden Development, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv61256
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Camden Development, Inc. v. 84 Lumber Company, L.P.
as 3:2021cv00219
Plaintiff:
Camden Development, Inc.
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
