Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 253
Saxena v. Jackson, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff: GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Defendant: GARY M. JACKSON, MELISSA T. ANNIS, ZACHARY BANKS and others
United States v. Blanton-Barnes
as 24-7032
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MORGAN CAMERON BLANTON-BARNES
Larez et al v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00324
Plaintiff: Gary Larez, Brandon Stone, Dewayne Clements and others
Defendant: FNU Wilkens, GCCF, Jacob LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Mayorkas
as 24-1117
Plaintiff: CAMERON NELSON
Defendant: ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, United Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1113
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Parker et al v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2024cv00178
Plaintiff: Felisha Parker and Laresha Parker
Defendant: Lawton City of, James T Smith, Terry Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson (ID 44578) v. Ahrens et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv03024
Plaintiff: Anthony Jefferson
Defendant: Jace Ahrens, Allen Mason, Matthew Moore and others
Interested Party: Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Indemnity Insurance Company of North America v. Sloan et al
as 1:2024cv00274
Plaintiff: Indemnity Insurance Company of North America
Defendant: THE LAW OFFICES OF CAMERON AND RUSSEL, LLC, Michael Sloan, Michael D. Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Type: Contract Insurance
Tolliver v. Harvanek
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner: Timothy Fitzgerald Tolliver
Respondent: Cameron Harvanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
K. v. OMALLEY
as 2:2024cv00061
Petitioner: Cameron K.
Defendant: MARTIN OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?