Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lawson v. University of Hawaii, et al.
as 24-6626
Defendant:
DAVID LASSNER, UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII, CAMILLE NELSON and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LAWSON
Lawson v. United States District Court for the District of Hawaii
as 24-4288
Petitioner:
KENNETH LAWSON
Real Party In Interest:
DAVID LASSNER, CAMILLE NELSON, UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Lawson v. University of Hawaii, et al.
as 24-3941
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LAWSON
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII, DAVID LASSNER, MICHAEL BRUNO and others
Lawson v. University of Hawaii, et al.
as 24-2862
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LAWSON
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII, DAVID LASSNER, in his official and individual capacities, MICHAEL BRUNO, in his official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
NELSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11365
Plaintiff:
D'ANDRA CAMILLE NELSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fernendez et al v. Air Liquide-Big Three Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00356
Defendant:
Air Liquide America Specialty Gases, LLC, Air Liquide America, LP and Air Liquide-Big Three Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Patrick Fernandez, Raven Franklin Fernendez, Anthony Wayne Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2007cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
