Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Canty et al v. Daniels et al
as 1:2023cv01066
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Canty, Johnny Cook, Betty Fambrough and others
Defendant:
Todd Daniels, Dimensionall Transportation LLC, American Zurich Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Canty-Fischer et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01018
Plaintiff:
Camille Canty-Fischer and Sequoia Perryman
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Griffin v. Coffee County et al
as 5:2019cv00092
Defendant:
Lindsey Griswold, Linda Canty, Jeffrey Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Torrey Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANTY v. SMITH et al
as 5:2019cv00175
Defendant:
WASHINGTON COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER, MAJOR MARK MCGRATH and SHERIFF THOMAS SMITH
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEE CANTY, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANTY v. PRIOR et al
as 5:2017cv00237
Plaintiff:
MARTIN CANTY
Defendant:
WILLIAM A PRIOR, JR, CLINT C MALCOLM, HULANE E GEORGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canty et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 4:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Trinisha Canty and John Canty
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CANTY v. USA
as 5:2016cv00229
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
CHADWICK CANTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Canty v. Head
as 1:2015cv03890
Petitioner:
Martin Canty
Respondent:
Frederick Head
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Genworth Life Insurance Company v. Canty
as 1:2014cv01084
Plaintiff:
Genworth Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Gregory A. Canty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
