Cases 1 - 10 of 12
LIPTOK v. FAZIO et al
as 2:2023cv02955
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LIPTOK
Defendant:
ROBERT BRUCE FAZIO and ERH CAPITAL PARTNERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
HOUSING EQUALITY CENTER OF PENNSYLVANIA v. PROMANAGED INC. et al
as 2:2022cv04894
Plaintiff:
HOUSING EQUALITY CENTER OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
PROMANAGED INC., PRO-MANAGED LLC, REVO CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Water Gap Acquisition Partners, LLC et al v. Smithfield Township et al
as 3:2021cv02000
Plaintiff:
Water Gap Acquisition Partners, LLC and Water Gap Capital Partners, LLC
Defendant:
Smithfield Township, Smithfield Township Board of Supervisors, Robert Lovenheim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORDON v. GMH SOUTHPOINTE HOLDINGS, LP et al
as 2:2021cv00236
Defendant:
GMH CAPITAL PARTNERS, GMH SOUTHPOINTE HOLDINGS, LP and SHAY CARELLY
Plaintiff:
EDWARD GORDON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv07222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
